Social Security

Stewart-v-Advocate for Scotland

[2000] UKSSCSC CSDLA_512_1998Social Security & Child Support Commissioners2000

“Care component - whether attention was required in connection with the bodily function of urinating and in particular, following completion of that function”

Read the full brief — free

You're reading the free summary of Stewart-v-Advocate for Scotland. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.

Create free account Already have one? Sign in

No card required. Free forever.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

More Social Security cases

Rev 2

[2005] UKSSCSC CTC_3543_2004

RH_4_04

[2004] UKSSCSC CH_880_2003

RTC_1_04

[2004] UKSSCSC CTC_1106_2002

Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v. Nelligan

[2003] UKSSCSC CP_3632_2001

Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v. Miah

[2003] UKSSCSC CJSA_4620_2000

Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v. Whalley

[2003] UKSSCSC CI_6027_1999

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.