Family

TJ v MS (Article 11(6-8) BIIA: Relocation: Art 24 EUCFR)

[2017] EWHC Fam 3802High Court (Family)2017

“IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE - FAMILY DIVISION Royal Courts of JusticeStrand, London 15th November 2017 B e f o r e :”

Read the full brief — free

You're reading the free summary of TJ v MS (Article 11(6-8) BIIA: Relocation: Art 24 EUCFR). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.

Create free account Already have one? Sign in

No card required. Free forever.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

More Family cases

Bristol City Council v CC & Ors [2026] EWCOP 4 (T3) (22 January 2026)

[2026] EWCOP 4

AA & Ors, In the Matter Of

[2026] EWHC Fam 317

Nottinghamshire County Council v JW & Anor [2026] EWCOP 13 (T2) (19 March 2026)

[2026] EWCOP 13

A (Care and Placement orders), Re

[2026] EWFC 62 (B)

PX, In the Matter Of [2025] EWCOP 57 (T2) (03 June 2025)

[2026] EWCOP 57

S v S (No. 2)(Art 21 Welfare)

[2026] EWHC Fam 434

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.