“J. Anderson, for the pannel, objected —That the species facti in the minor proposition did not amount to an uttering of the note, seeing that it was not set forth that the letter, said to have been p…”
You're reading the free summary of HIS MAJESTY'S ADVOCATE v WILLIAM HARVEY Court of Justiciary. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.