“JUDGE HICKS: The respondent and cross-appellant, Miss McGloughlin, was employed by the appellants, a small partnership firm of dispensing chemists, as a sales assistant.”
You're reading the free summary of Rubenstein & Anor (t/a McGuffies Dispensing Chemists) v McGloughlin (No 1). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.