“Representation: Dilwar Azad of Counsel for the Applicant, instructed by Rose & Rose HPLP; John Clargo of Counsel for the Respondent, on a direct access basis”
You're reading the free summary of Milliken & Anor v Bavister (adverse possession - Schedule 6 of the Land Registration Act 2002 - sufficiency of acts - intention to possess - permission - reasonable belief). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.