“It appears the Complaint here may not have come to the attention of the Respondent, as the postal copy has been returned to Nominet, and emails have bounced back.”
You're reading the free summary of Smart-tek (UK) Ltd v Kelly. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.