“The respondents reclaimed , but the Court unanimously adhered, adding, however, a recommendation to the inspector to take the assistance of some persons practically acquainted with the operation in q…”
You're reading the free summary of TROTTER & Ors v THE BURNTISLAND WHALE FISHING COMPANY (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.