“Rutherfurd , for petitioners, replied —That this was not at all a mere preliminary point; that it was of the very essence of the cause; it involved the question, entail or no entail, which he had a r…”
You're reading the free summary of WILLIAM CUNNINGHAM CUNNINGHAM GRAHAM and his Trustees v ROBERT CUNNINGHAM BONTINE (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.