“3. It is also arguable as set out at ground 8 that the judge at paragraph 13 made an assumption not warranted by the evidence that the fact the appellant had obtained visit visas on two occasions fit…”
You're reading the free summary of OA164512012. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.