“[2] Mr. Bovey, for the appellant, submitted that it was apparent from the Tribunal's determination of 19 August 1998 that they had erred in law and he submitted that the appeal should be remitted to …”
You're reading the free summary of Kazmi v Secrtary Of State For The Home Department. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.