“The Employment Tribunal held that the Appellant company, the transferee following a service provision change, needed permission to amend its ET3 in order to challenge whether Claimant was an employee…”
You're reading the free summary of Big City Leisure Ltd v McCarthy (Practice and Procedure : Amendment). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.