Immigration

UI2023004743

[2024] UKAITUR UI2023004743United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments2024

“5. It was not reasonable to criticise the appellant for failing to have documentary evidence of photographs and telephone calls.”

Read the full brief — free

You're reading the free summary of UI2023004743. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.

Create free account Already have one? Sign in

No card required. Free forever.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

More Immigration cases

UI2025005115

[2026] UKAITUR UI2025005115

UI2025004844

[2026] UKAITUR UI2025004844

UI2025003620

[2026] UKAITUR UI2025003620

UI2025003659

[2026] UKAITUR UI2025003659

UI2025004512

[2026] UKAITUR UI2025004512

Kaur, R (On the Application Of) v Entry Clearance Officer (New Delhi) (ECO allegation of deception; fairness)

[2026] UKUT IAC 80

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.