“Held (Lord Rutherfurd Clark diss.) that the owner of lands abutting on any street for the continuous length of more than 100 yards was liable for one-third of the cost of upholding the footways befor…”
You're reading the free summary of Sturrock v. Duke of Buccleuch. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.