“In the absence of an Employment Tribunal issuing a Judgment pursuant to Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 it cannot be inferred that a claim h…”
You're reading the free summary of Arvunescu v Quick Release (Automotive) Ltd (Practice and Procedure: Striking-out/dismissal). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.