“I. As no course of dealing on credit was proved or alleged between the parties, but the reverse having been the case, the presumption is, both in law and according to the usage of trade, that the she…”
You're reading the free summary of ARTHUR STEWART v SAMUEL GORDON (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.