“Held that, as it was not proved that the miner could not have worked underground if his right eye had not been injured, his partial incapacity was incapacity resulting from the injury entitling him t…”
You're reading the free summary of Lee v. William Baird & Co., Ltd. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.