“Observed ( per Lord President) that the back-letter must be held as not recorded, notwithstanding the duplicate, but that, had it been recorded, it would not have been material to the case.”
You're reading the free summary of The Scottish Heritable Security Coy. (Ltd) v. Allan, Campbell, & Coy., and The Scottish Heritable Security Coy. (Ltd) v. John Watson & Sons. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.