“Held that the pursuer's action was relevant, but as the contract or agreement alleged by him was an innominate contract of an unusual kind it could only be proved by writ or oath.”
You're reading the free summary of Garden v. Earl of Aberdeen. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.