“[1] In my opinion of 14 May 2013 ([2013] CSOH 72) I determined the sums which MMS was due to pay MGL in respect of the loss of its entitlement to interest in the arbitration against HYL and also the …”
You're reading the free summary of MCCRINDLE GROUP LTD v. MACLAY MURRAY AND SPENS. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.