“Held that he was subject to the jurisdiction of the Scots Courts, in respect that, as the purposes of the marriage-contract conveyance had not been recorded, he had never been feudally divested of th…”
You're reading the free summary of Smith v. Stuart. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.