“Held that the annual value of the manse did not fall to be included in reckoning his income, that therefore it did not exceed £400, and that he was entitled to the abatement.”
You're reading the free summary of M'Dougall (Surveyor of Taxes) v. Sutherland. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.