“The pursuer having objected to this report, as founded on erroneous calculations and assumptions in point of fact, which he offered to disprove, the Lord Ordinary remitted to the reporter to reconsid…”
You're reading the free summary of SIR CHARLES HALKET v The EARL of ELGIN and his Trustees (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.