“1. This is a case where the defendant has been convicted after a trial of obtaining some £50,000 by way of income support and other payments when, in truth, he had assets of over £1 million.”
You're reading the free summary of AG -v- Cocks. Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.