“The first provision declares, that not only Adam Mure, and the heirs of tailzie descending from him, but also ‘the heirs descending of the bodies of the said Margaret and Jean Mure who shall succeed …”
You're reading the free summary of JAMES OCHTERLONY LOCKHART MURE and Mandatary v JAMES OCHTERLONY LOCKHART MURE Junior, and his Curator ad litem (Court of Session). Create a free account to unlock the full reasoning, the cited authorities and the verbatim judgment — plus structured briefs for 412,000+ UK judgments.
No card required. Free forever.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Falls back to Google for old citations BAILII catalogues separately
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.