Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellants are citizens of Bangladesh who appealed to the First-tier Tribunal against the decision of the respondent of 25 September 2013. The First-tier Tribunal dismissed the appeal in a determination promulgated on 13 April 2015. First-tier Tribunal Judge Levin granted the appellants permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal.
By way of a letter dated 10 March 2015 the appellants' solicitor's state requested that it be treated as withdrawn by the Upper Tribunal.
Consent of the Upper Tribunal is required for a party to withdraw its case. Having carefully considered the facts of this appeal as a whole, and observing that the respondent was the successful party before the First-tier Tribunal, I give such consent for the case to be withdrawn.
Accordingly with my consent, and pursuant to rule 17(5) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, this appeal is recorded as "Withdrawn with the consent of the Upper Tribunal". This is a Notice pursuant to rule 17(5) to inform the parties that the appellant's case is withdrawn.
The effect of the appellants' case being withdrawn from the Upper Tribunal is that the proceedings before the Upper Tribunal are at an end. There is no appeal before the Upper Tribunal and the First-tier Tribunal's decision shall stand.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.