Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellants: Ms M Malhotra, Counsel instructed by Shri Venkateshwara Solicitors
The first Appellant, a national of India, date of birth 10 May 1985, appealed against the Respondent's decision, dated 12 June 2014, to refuse an application made on 28 March 2014 for leave to remain in the United Kingdom as a Tier 4 (General) Student Migrant under the points-based system and in combined decisions the Respondent made removal directions under Section 47 of the Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006.
The first Appellant's application was refused with reference to paragraph 245ZX(c) with reference to paragraph 115A of Appendix A and paragraph 245ZX(d) of the Immigration Rules HC 395 (as amended). In particular the matter was refused because there was no valid Confirmation of Acceptance for Studies (CAS).
The second Appellant, a national of India, date of birth 15 March 1985 appealed against a decision, dated 12 June 2014, to refuse his leave to remain as a dependent partner of a points-based system migrant and similarly to make removal directions under Section 47 of the 2006 Act.
The appeal against those decisions came to be considered by First-tier Tribunal Judge K St John Wiseman (the judge), who on 23 November 2014 dismissed their appeals. It followed although the judge made no reference to it that their appeals against removal directions must similarly have failed.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.