C H v T B Limited

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS At the Tribunal On 17 July 1997 Before

JUDGE PETER CLARK : On 14 May 1993 the Applicant, Miss Casey Hughes presented an Originating Application to the Central Office of Industrial Tribunals. She named two Respondents. The second Respondent, which had employed her until her summary dismissal effective on 19 February 1993; the first Respondent was a Director of that Company.

She raised four complaints; unfair dismissal; unlawful sex discrimination in the form of alleged sexual harassment by the first Respondent for which she contended the second Respondent was vicariously liable; unlawful deductions from her wages and a failure to provide written reasons for her dismissal.

The matter came on for hearing before the London (North) Industrial Tribunal on a total of five days spread over a period of one year between February 1995 and February 1996. The Industrial Tribunal upheld her last complaint, but dismissed the first three to which we have referred. Extended Reasons for that decision are dated 17 May 1996.

Dissatisfied with the Tribunal's decision to dismiss her complaints of sex discrimination and unfair dismissal she entered a Notice of Appeal to this Tribunal against those parts of the decision on 25 June 1996.