Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The unanimous decision of the Tribunal is that the respondent unfairly dismissed the claimant and discriminated against her on the grounds of her sex. The Tribunal also makes a declaration that the respondent failed to provide the claimant with a contract of employment or a written statement. �Accordingly the Tribunal orders the respondent to pay to the claimant the following:-
�420.00 for failure to give the claimant a contract of employment or statement of employment particulars;
�17,500.00 compensation for injury to feelings for discrimination on the grounds of sex;
The claimant appeared and was represented by Miceal Canavan, solicitor, instructed by McGuinness & Canavan, Solicitors.
1.���� The claimant lodged four claim forms.� The first two of these, 1251/08 and 1506/08, alleged that the respondent had failed to give the claimant a contract of employment, an itemised pay statement, to pay her Statutory Maternity Pay (SMP) or to deal with her grievance.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.