Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
LORD JUSTICE THORPE LORD JUSTICE POTTER LORD JUSTICE SEDLEY ____________________
(Computer-Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of Smith Bernal Wordwave Limited 190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838 Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
MR MICHAEL NICHOLLS AND MR TOM CARTER (instructed by Russell & Co, Malvern WR14 2AH) appeared on behalf of the Appellant MR ANTHONY KIRK QC AND MR ANTHONY LOWE (instructed by Harrison Clarke, Worcester WR1 2JD) appeared on behalf of the Respondent ____________________
To that second paragraph can be attached the provisions of Article 18, which reads:
The judge looked at all the evidence, of course, and also at a letter from Chloe which had been written a few days before the hearing and which emphasised her sense of frustration at not being listened to by the adults. The judge in the end dealt with this important question in paragraph 33 of his judgment, when he said this:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.