Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Computer-Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of Smith Bernal Wordwave Limited 190 Fleet Street London EC4A 2AG Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838 (Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
MR R GARFIELD (instructed by Sinclairs Solicitors, DX 52361, Penarth) appeared on behalf of the CLAIMANT MR J TILLIARD QC & MS R HENKE (instructed by Eversheds, Callaghan Square, Cardiff CF10) appeared on behalf of the DEFENDANT Friday, 13 December 2002 ____________________
Notwithstanding Dr Davies' early venture into the standard of proof at the outset of these proceedings, both he and a member of the Governing Body have addressed this subject in more recent witness statements which were made only last week. I am mindful of the need for circumspection on the part of the court when considering accounts or rationalisations of a decision which are detailed only after the commencement of proceedings and, in this case, a long time after the commencement of proceedings and following some earlier observations by at least one of the witnesses.
He then sets out the various matters which he took into account. So far as the Discipline Committee is concerned, there is a recent statement from Councillor Douglas John, a long-standing governor and, indeed, the chair of the governors since�October�2002. He was one of the Discipline Committee that considered this case. He states:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.