Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Finsbury Pavement London EC2A 1ER Tel: 020 7422 6131 Fax: 020 7422 6134 Web: www.merrillcorp.com/mls Email: [email protected] (Official Shorthand Writers to the Court) ____________________
It is argued that the declaratory relief sought by the mother (in contrast to that sought by the son), is not a declaration as to the lawfulness or otherwise of any act done or yet to be done in relation to "that person " namely the son (P). Rather, it is said that she complains of an act done to her or advances her claims as the victim of breaches of Convention rights.
It is argued on behalf of the Defendants, and this was at the forefront of the argument put before me on behalf of the Official Solicitor on behalf of the son (P), that section 47(1) is an ancillary provision and/or a provision that facilitates the exercise of the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.