Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber) Information Rights Heard by Cloud Video Platform Heard on: 1 July 2025 Decision Given On: 18 July 2025 B e f o r e :
Representation: For the Appellant: Did not attend For the Respondent: Miss Iyengar, Counsel ____________________
(a) The IC failed to consider the Appellant's compliance efforts as a mitigating factor; and
(a) the IC's objective in imposing monetary penalties is to promote compliance with (in this case) PECR;
(b) the penalty must be sufficiently meaningful to act both as sanction and deterrent;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.