Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
              This appeal comes back before me for the decision to be re-made, following my decision dated 6 March 2003 by which I set aside the First-tier Tribunal's decision to allow the appellant's human rights appeal. It is worth repeating the background facts and circumstances which are set out in my earlier, error of law, decision.
              The appellant is a citizen of India born in 1994. On 13 May 2021 she made a human rights claim on the basis of family life with a partner. That application was refused in a decision dated 4 January 2022.
              The appellant appealed that decision and her appeal came before First-tier Tribunal Judge T. Lawrence ("the FtJ") at a hearing on 30 May 2022. In a decision dated 12 July 2022 the FtJ allowed the appeal. Permission to appeal the FtJ's decision having been granted by a judge of the First-tier Tribunal ("FtT"), the appeal came before me.
              In my error of law decision I summarised the grounds of appeal. As regards Ground 2, I said this at [6]:
"Ground 2 takes issue with the FtJ's consideration of GEN.3.2. of Appendix FM of the Rules and the Article 8 assessment. The grounds argue that the FtJ failed to reason what were the exceptional circumstances or the unjustifiably harsh outcome evident in the appeal".
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.