Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The decisions of the First-tier Tribunal sitting at Newcastle-upon-Tyne on 10.11.11 under references 200/10/01026 and 200/10/01167 involved errors on a point of law and are set aside.
The Upper Tribunal is not in a position to re-decide the two appeals. It therefore refers the appeals to be decided afresh by a completely differently constituted First-tier Tribunal and in accordance with the Directions set out below. �
This decision is made under section 12(1), 12 (2)(a) and 12(2)(b)(i) of the Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007
Subject to any later Directions by a District Tribunal Judge of the First-tier Tribunal, the Upper Tribunal directs as follows:
(1) The new hearing will be at an oral hearing, at which the appellant and a presenting officer for the Secretary of State must attend. The appellant and the First-tier Tribunal will need to liaise over where the venue for the hearing will be.�
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.