Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Digital Transcription by Marten Walsh Cherer Ltd., 1st Floor, Quality House, 6-9 Quality Court Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1HP. Tele No: 020 7067 2900, Fax No: 020 7831 6864, DX: 410 LDE Email: [email protected] Website: www.martenwalshcherer.com
MR. R. BUSWELL (instructed by DMH Stallard LLP) for the Applicant MR. N. BAKER (instructed by Gisby Harrison Solicitors) for the Respondent ____________________
However, I was concerned that I was not so much facing brevity on this topic as almost total silence.
After correcting a mathematical error in the presentation of the wife's counsel at first instance it appears that the wife's claim was for a total of �1,829,000.
That is a decision squarely within the district judge's legitimate discretion. It is impossible for me to say that it is plainly wrong. I conclude there is no prospect, let alone a real prospect, of disturbing that disposition. I therefore refuse permission on that ground.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.