Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
I have considered whether any parties require the protection of an anonymity direction. No anonymity direction was made previously in respect of this Appellant. Having considered all the circumstances and evidence I do not consider it necessary to make an anonymity direction.
This is an appeal by the Appellant against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge M Davies promulgated on 8 November 2013 which dismissed the Appellant�s appeal on all grounds.
The Appellants are a brother and sister was born on 16 August 1990 and 26 October 1985. They were therefore aged 23 and 27 respectively at the time of the Judge�s decision. They are nationals of Nepal.
The Appellant�s father was issued with a settlement visa on 25 June 2009 outside of the Immigration Rules pursuant to Annex A of section 2A of Chapter 15 of the Immigration Directorate Instructions. The policy provides that any Ghurkha with more than four years service who had been discharged from the Brigade of Ghurkhas before the 1 st of July 1997 will be eligible for settlement in the United Kingdom. The Appellants father met these criteria.
On 10 October 2012 the Appellants together with their mother applied for entry clearance as Ghurkha dependents.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.