Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Having considered all documents lodged and having heard from the parties' respective representatives, Ms M Butler, of counsel, instructed by TV Edwards Solicitors, on behalf of the Applicant and Ms C Rowlands, of Counsel, instructed by London Borough of Hackney on behalf of the Respondent, at a hearing at Field House, London on 6 to 8 July 2021.
(1) I make a declaration, for the reasons given in the attached judgment, that FAD's date of birth is 13 April 2002.
(2) The Respondent shall pay 50% of the Applicant's reasonable costs of this claim to be assessed if not agreed. There shall be a detailed assessment of the Applicant's legal aid costs.
(3) Permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal is refused on the basis that there are no arguable errors of law in the decision. The grounds submitted by the respondent amount to no more than an attempt to re-argue the issues already fully and properly determined by the Tribunal.
Sent / Handed to the applicant, respondent and any interested party / the applicant's, respondent's and any interested party's solicitors on (date): 11 August 2021
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.