Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Final Notice referred to the requirements of sections 83 - 88 and Schedule 9 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (the "Act") and set out the following details of the alleged failure by Quick Rent Properties:
" The Council is satisfied, on the balance of probabilities that on 8/12/16 you were engaged in letting agency work and that you have failed to comply with the above regulations. In particular, you have:
Failed to publish a list of the agents relevant fees, a statement saying whether you belong to a client money protection scheme on the company's website at www.quickpropertygroup.co.uk "
The Final Notice refers to the office of Quick Rent Properties located at 24 Osborn Street, London E1 6TD, which is within the Borough of Tower Hamlets. Quick Rent Properties state that they carry on business activities, other than accounting duties, from 11 Ensign House, Admirals Way, London E14 9XQ, which is also within the Borough of Tower Hamlets.
The sections of the Act that are referred to in this decision or that are of greatest relevance to this appeal are set out below in Annex A to this decision.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.