Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The hearing took place on 25 November 2021.  With the consent of the parties, the form of the hearing was V (video) via the Tribunal video platform. The appellant and his representative attended by telephone due to connection difficulties. The panel and the respondents attended by video.  A face to face hearing was not held because a remote hearing was more convenient in the current circumstances. The documents to which I was referred were contained in two bundles - the first being 535 page and the additional bundle being 77 pages.
Prior notice of the hearing had been published on the gov.uk website, with information about how representatives of the media or members of the public could apply to join the hearing remotely in order to observe the proceedings.� As such, the hearing was held in public.
             This case concerned regulation 80 determinations issued to the appellant, Mr Dean Hedges, for unpaid PAYE for tax years 12/13, 13/14, 14/15 and 15/16 in relation to a public house called The Farmhouse in South London; and associated penalties for non-submission of PAYE returns.
             The PAYE determinations under appeal amount to �11,225.60 made up of the following amounts for the tax years in question:
             The penalties under appeal amount to �4,398.56 and are made up of the following amounts:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.