Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Appellant appeals to the Upper Tribunal, with permission, against the determination of the First-tier Tribunal (Judge Fox) promulgated on 26th November 2013 by which it dismissed the Appellant�s appeal against the Entry Clearance Officer�s decision to refuse her entry clearance as a spouse
It was accepted before the First-tier Tribunal that the only issue was accommodation. In the determination the Judge set out the evidence before him between paragraphs 11 and 18, the submissions between paragraph 19 and 24 and his findings from paragraph 25 to 31.
"This letter does not in any way constitute permission being granted by Islington Council. I am simply providing the information as requested."
The Sponsor told the Judge that he believed he had permission but then agreed that the Appellant did not have permission and agreed that she required permission.
The Judge noted that housing benefit was paid to the Sponsor�s father but that the Sponsor claimed to pay rent to his father.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.