Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Respondent: Mr D. Sellwood, counsel instructed by The Cardinal Hume Centre
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the respondent is granted anonymity. No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court. The reason is that the appeal includes consideration of a claimed fear of persecution.
            We refer to the appellant as the Claimant, and the Respondent as the Secretary of State, for the remainder of these reasons.
            The Secretary of State appeals against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Clarke, who allowed the Claimant's asylum claim.
            In a decision dated 16 th June 2021, the Secretary of State considered the Claimant's protection claim based on the perception that he is a gay man, although he is not, with the perception based on his commercial distribution of sex toys in his country of origin, Cameroon.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.