Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
SIR MARK POTTER THE PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION LORD JUSTICE SCOTT BAKER and SIR ROBIN AULD ____________________
Kate Branigan QC and Barbara Mills (instructed by Griffith Smith) for the Appellant Jane Probyn (instructed by Withy King) for the Respondent Hearing dates: 25th and 26th June 2008 ____________________
i) Approaching the question of the relocation of the mother and H to Brighton on a flawed and incorrect basis.
ii) Inappropriately linking the question of the mother and H's relocation to the acquisition by Mr A of parental responsibility.
iii) Having inappropriately linked the question of location to the acquisition of parental responsibility, making a shared residence order where such order was wrong in principle and inappropriate in the circumstances of the case.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.