Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
       On 30 November 2023 Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Davidge found an error of law material to the decision of a judge of the First-tier Tribunal who dismissed the appellant's appeal against the refusal of her application for international protection.
       There was no challenge to the adverse credibility findings made by the First-tier Tribunal Judge in relation to claimed risk in Chamchamal in Iraq.
       The material error was said to relate to muddle concerning the appellant's home area. The appellant was treated as being from the IKR and being able to return to Chamchamal or being able to relocate elsewhere within the IKR, whereas the agreed position in the reasons for refusal letter was that the appellant's home area was Dakuk within the Kirkuk Governorate.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.