Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
O'Carroll v Norbrook Laboratories Ltd (Constructive Dismissal ) [2002] NIIT 00454_99 (18 February 2002)
The unanimous decision of the tribunal is that the applicant has failed to show that there had been a fundamental breach of his contract by the respondent and therefore his claim that he was constructively dismissed must fail.
The applicant was represented by Ms Mary Larkin, Barrister-at-Law, instructed by P J McGrory & Co, Solicitors.
The respondent was represented by Mr F O'Donoghue, Barrister-at-Law, instructed by R A Mullan & Son, Solicitors.
(ii) details of the behaviour which was not appropriate for Norbrook or its image;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.