Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
DAR Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of WordWave International Limited A DTI Company 165 Fleet Street London EC4A 2DY Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7404 1424 (Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
Ms E Banton (instructed by Public Access) appeared on behalf of the Appellant The Respondents were not present and were not represented ____________________
That is self-evidently an extremely offensive and intemperate document to be sent by anyone, let alone a solicitor.
He also went on to point out that one of the documents in the transaction had been notarised by one of her colleagues at the firm, giving the firm's address. That letter was in evidence before the Employment Tribunal.
Ms Howe attached importance also to the fact that the Appellant refused to acknowledge that there was anything wrong in the e-mail, which Ms Howe regarded as particularly concerning because it suggested that she was liable to behave equally intemperately in the future.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.