Immigration

IA130672014

[2014] UKAITUR IA130672014United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments2014

Get the AI brief for this case

Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.

Quick orient — first passages from judgment

�18� Nor is there any reason why an application for a residence card as the spouse of the German national exercising treaty rights here in the UK could not be made.�

Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

More Immigration cases

UI2025004453

[2026] UKAITUR UI2025004453

UI2025003987

[2026] UKAITUR UI2025003987

UI2025004274

[2026] UKAITUR UI2025004274

UI2025005447

[2026] UKAITUR UI2025005447

UI2025001383

[2026] UKAITUR UI2025001383

JR2024LON001256

[2026] UKAITUR JR2024LON001256

Common Room

Discussion

0 comments · About the Common Room →

No comments yet — start the discussion.

Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.