Family

R v R

[2012] EWHC Fam 2390High Court (Family)2012

Get the AI brief for this case

Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.

Quick orient — first passages from judgment

Mr I. L. KENNERLEY (instructed by Silk Family Law Solicitors) for the Applicant Mr M. BRADLEY (instructed by Payne, Hicks, Beach Solicitors) for the Respondent Hearing dates: 23rd to 27th July 2012 ____________________

Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

More Family cases

PX, In the Matter Of [2025] EWCOP 57 (T2) (03 June 2025)

[2026] EWCOP 57

A (Care and Placement orders), Re

[2026] EWFC 62 (B)

Nottinghamshire County Council v JW & Anor [2026] EWCOP 13 (T2) (19 March 2026)

[2026] EWCOP 13

Bristol City Council v CC & Ors [2026] EWCOP 4 (T3) (22 January 2026)

[2026] EWCOP 4

F v M

[2026] EWHC Fam 44

Confidential Prospective Adopters v BM & Ors

[2026] EWHC Fam 907

Common Room

Discussion

0 comments · About the Common Room →

No comments yet — start the discussion.

Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.

Family

R v R

[2012] EWHC Fam 2390High Court (Family)2012

Cite this case in OSCOLA →

Get the AI brief for this case

Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.