Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Appellant born on 31 st January 1965 is a citizen of Ghana. The Appellant who was present was represented by Mr Ikhlak. The Respondent was represented by Mr McVeety.
The Appellant had made application for a residence card as the spouse of an EEA national under Regulation 7 of the 2006 Regulations. The Respondent had refused that application on 4 th January 2014. The Appellant had appealed that decision and her appeal was heard by First-tier Tribunal Judge Ransley sitting at Manchester on 20 th May 2014. The judge had dismissed the appeal under both the 2006 Regulations and Article 8 of the ECHR.
Mr Ikhlak referred to the determination and said that an error had been made by the judge essentially repeating the error made by the Respondent and that Kareem was not relevant because there were no doubts concerning that certificate.
Mr McVeety referred me to the marriage certificate contained within the bundle of documents together with the other two relevant documents which were certifying documents contained within pages 3 and 4 of the Appellant�s bundle.
At the conclusion of the hearing I reserved my decision which I now provide with reasons.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.