Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The respondent appealed with permission against the determination of the First-tier Tribunal Judge Callender-Smith, promulgated on 21 October 2014 in which he allowed the appellant's appeal against the decision of the respondent on human rights grounds. For the reasons given in my decision of 17 March 2015, a copy of which is attached at Annex A, I was satisfied that the decision did involve the making of an error of law.
Owing to the appellant's subsequent claim for asylum (now withdrawn) and a pending application for her daughter to be registered as a British Citizen (now granted), it has not been possible to proceed to remake the case.
The appellant's daughter has now acquired British Citizenship. That is a significant change in circumstances, and accordingly on 4 November 2015, I made the following directions:
It appears that the appellant's asylum application has been withdrawn as her daughter has now been registered as a British Citizen.
There has been no response to these directions. Accordingly, I am satisfied that neither party objects to the matter being determined without a hearing and has nothing further to say.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.