Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This is an appeal against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal dated 9 September 2014.
The background is as set out in paragraph 2 of the First-tier Tribunal�s determination:
The appeal before the First-tier Tribunal was limited to the decision being unlawful in terms of Section 6 of the Human Rights Act. The appellant relied on Article 8 which was therefore before the First-tier Tribunal.
�10. No evidence has been placed before me to suggest there exists more than normal emotional ties between the two. Both are adults. I therefore did not find that the Appellant has proved that Family Life subsists between himself and his sister�.
�12. Even if I had found that Family Life exists between the parties, I would not have found that I had jurisdiction to decide these matters when the only permissible grounds are human rights�.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.